Business

| Submit Comments | View Comments (5)
Joe Harrison and Ian Allison on strike at Fujitsu in Bracknell
Joe Harrison and Ian Allison on strike at Fujitsu in Bracknell
advertisement

Fujitsu rejects 'bias' claims over job cuts

By Hugh Fort
January 14, 2010

A claim of discrimination against Fujitsu’s redundancy process has added further tension to strike action over job cuts and pensions.

The Unite union fears a “disproportionate” number of women, part-time and non-white staff have lost their jobs in a round of cuts by the IT giant, although the company refutes the allegation.

The company revealed this week 89 people from the Bracknell branch in Lovelace Road had lost their jobs, as well as six in a smaller office in Winnersh.

Union members, who will walk out again today and tomorrow, braved the snow to picket outside the company last Thursday, Friday and Monday.

Fujitsu revealed the number of staff in its Eskdale Road office in Winnersh Triangle has been cut from 17 to 11.

A spokesman said five employees were made redundant and the additional staff loss had been due to someone who had left and not been replaced.

Union members are also unhappy at the company’s new pension scheme, which they say leaves staff around 20 per cent worse off.

Members also say Fujitsu is still in a strong position, with a £200 million profit last year despite the recession, and has no need to cut positions or impose a pay freeze.

Other staff were taking part in non-strike industrial action by not working unpaid overtime and only working their exact hours.

The row has been stoked by an allegation of discrimination by the union.

Unite claims it has identified “major discrepancies” in the scoring and selection for redundancies and says it has data showing women, part-time staff and non-white employees scored disproportionately lower than male, full-time and white members of staff.

Peter Skyte, Unite national officer for IT and communications, said: “We are disturbed to find that a disproportionate number of women, part-time and ethnic minority workers appear to have been selected for redundancy at Fujitsu, but have had no meaningful response from the company to our queries on this.

“This strengthens our case for a fairer, open and more transparent pay system which we also suspect may be masking potential discrimination.”

But a Fujitsu spokesman said: “We are very disappointed Unite has made these allegations.

“As an equal opportunities employer Fujitsu consulted on the proposed selection criteria with elected employee representatives and with representatives of its recognised trade unions (including Unite) throughout the collective redundancy programme and is confident that no discrimination resulted.

“We are aware of the points raised by Unite and have responded detailing our reasons as to why we are confident our selection process was fair and was not discriminatory.”

The company announced last autumn it was looking to streamline its UK operations by about 10 per cent, around 1,200 staff.

However, the spokesman confirmed the amount of staff who had been made redundant nationally, either voluntarily or compulsory, had been reduced to 876, with 586 taking voluntary redundancy.

| Submit Comments | View Comments (5)

Most recent user comments 5 of 5

Show 15 | 25 | 50 per page

   Pension schemes are not written in stone and most major companies no longer allow new joiners to participate in final salary schemes. Existing pension members are also being hit and final salary schemes are either being axed, or members asked to pay far higher contributions. Fujitsu is coming in line with MOST companies. Redundancies are also being looked at even by successful companies as the wage bill is the biggest overhead for most companies. Now why are only 10% of the workforce members of the union? Could it be because they can see the light and although unhappy with the cuts believe that they are needed to keep the company profitable enough to continue employing them?

So Unite members carry on screwing the company, I'm sure that Unite will sypathise with you when you are looking for new employment.

William Richards
16/01/2010 at 13:51 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   SO leave the place of work if you deserve better then surely you will find it????????
MPwannaB, Bracknell
15/01/2010 at 15:37 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   If you don't strike you will definitely lose out. Workers united together are far more powerful than the rich bosses who exploit them and I don't suppose any of them will be losing out on pensions or dividends. The laws in the UK are far to biased in favour of the bosses, in the rest of Europe they couldn't get away with the attacks on pensions and redundancies they are trying to carry out, as it would be illegal. Victory to the Fujitsu workers
r0uge, South of Reading
14/01/2010 at 20:56 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Never understand this,if you don't like the new pay/pension schemes find another job.................. Oh wait you can't as you are either getting good money even with the cuts or we are in a recession so there are no other jobs like this at the moment. Answers your own questions really doesnt it?

Unfortunatly you have to realistic in this day & age and striking is doing no-one any favours.
MPwannaB, Bracknell
14/01/2010 at 14:41 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Unite have a 10% membership in the3 company. Union officials must be extremely stupid to think that they could influence the company by calling a strike. When it comes to redundancies company loyalty is ALWAYS taken into account. So a striker or anon striker who in more loyal to the company? No brainer really
William Richards
14/01/2010 at 14:32 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Show 15 | 25 | 50 per page

Add Your Comments

 
Homes / Jobs Search
 
Jobs Homes

Brought to you by

Get the Job
Newsletter Sign Up
 
Sign up to the
weekly news
update


Submit
Loading poll, please wait...